Tennis Money Winners
Women tennis pros are overpaid?
At the 2006 French Open women an average of 2.3 per game continues, people on average 3.6 per game sets. For the winners of the seven games, the average means of 16.1 sets for the lady to win and 25.2 sets for the winners gentleman. Given a same price to each winner of around USD $ 1,000,000. Hence the lady $ 62K per set and the Lord of $ 39K per set do. It seems that the women play less tennis and more money . Earn This seems fair and balanced to you? Your opinion please. Thanks.
Typically, women have a lot more balls per as the men who win often do you the serve, so that the fixed salary per set is not a good metric. The actual difference in pay is on the other Tier 1 events. Men play only on the best 2 of 3 at these tournaments, but pay much more than the women to their tier-one events. Here, women are significantly underpaid relative to men, although they generate tend to bring more interest and more in the interest of viewers. Finally, the content of each athlete commands proportional to its ability to bring in viewers. Wimbledon harvests huge amounts of money from the tournament and most of the sum comes from the women's side of the draw. I support equal pay for women wallets.
