Tennis Theory
Anyone else think the two no-name tennis players at Wimbledon are delibrately make their game …?
last ridiculously long just to make a name for themselves? I mean, its stupid, they are at least 60 games each in the 5th Set now. And it does not prove they are brilliant. Just that they matched equally (and equally bad). Of course, this agreement that in theory might be always the fault of the tennis officials. Why not a rule that makes it a clear lead of 2 games, or the first player to reach 50 games, whichever comes first. In this way, it is his unlikly always necessary, but if it was, it would be this stupid To stop this farce, and other games are played.
I think it means that they are both garbage. The idea of them setting it up has to my mind, had Photos made it next to the score boards and a lot of interviews and advertising
